We hereby cast our eye back on SPY, “The New York Monthly” – that exemplar of “irony,” memorably belligerent, bilious adjective chains, and thrillingly recherché typography, from which our entire writing style (and ironic, memorable, belligerent, bilious, and recherché personality) derived. Where possible, we do actually attempt to stick to a precise ten-year retrospective, but we reserve the right to mix and match. |
March 1991I have this bias against any old Spy ish dated from the 1990s. Long past the halcyon days, right? And I certainly fall prey to halcyonism, as we will appreciate shortly. I can name a grand total of two girls (I use the term advisedly) whom I would actually do, and Jamie Lee Curtis, in her own halcyon days, is one of them. (Who’s the other?) And there she is on the cover this month. I’ve kind of always hated the cover, shot by Bonnie Schiffman. (Actually, the full credit plugs whatever disposable Amerikanski situation comedy she was stuck working on at the time: “THE COVER: Anything But Love’s Jamie Lee Curtis photographed by Bonnie Schiffman.”) First of all, J.L. Curtis looks pregnant: The orange and red everything, the stringy hair, the mishmash of styles, and particularly the Seussesque stacked striped hat and indeterminate red-gloved appendage draped over it. In other words, the cover is devastatingly effective at illustrating “The Tyranny of Trendiness,” the first article I read on trendspotting, which has now morphed into coolhunting. Let’s take ’er from the top, though. Advertising analysisNot much to gripe about this month, actually, to my chagrin. Bruce Willis looks smashing in a Leibovitz-AmEx-style square-format photo in an ad for Us, or, as my esteemed colleague used to call it, pUs. But it’s another advertisement for the advertising industry: “It is a well-documented fact that the American public has a fanatical preoccupation with people in the entertainment industry We offer you the opportunity to take advantage of that.” Actually, B. Willis looks almost exactly the same in this photo as he did on Regis this morning. I think somebody’s had work done. In any event, read Richard E. Grant’s With Nails and you’ll never look at Willis the same way again. Or Sandra Bernhard, for that matter. Or the Hungarians. Or Steve Martin. Anyone remember the Quality Paperback Book Club? Talk about branding with type: I signed up because of the Goudy usage more than anything. This was when I was a youngster, with no independent income or chequing account. Or much interest in middlebrow suburban book-club titles. To this day I think of the advertisements’ claim that some QPB books were resized “to fit special presses and save you even more.” The locution implanted a mental image that books are sort of cookie-cut-stamped by gigantic metal-walled dies on an assembly line. (I see the locution is in use by someone else. In fact, there seems to be a conspiracy afoot.) Well, they’ve got an ad in this issue. I’m not wild about it. Worse, they still exist. Dim racial memories of the sort Spy tends to trigger were, unsurprisingly, triggered by the advert for something entitled Amok: Fourth Dispatch, a kind of precursor to Re:Search, which I suppose would in fact have been listed in its pages, given that Amok’s subtitle is Sourcebook of the Extremes of Information in Print. It’s a quaint topic. Do you remember the days when it cost a fortune to produce a treatise on freaks with malformed partial Siamese twins jutting out of their abdomens, or particularly shocking genital mutilations, because you actually had to design and print them, then mail them at great cost to the four corners of the earth? And, like actors requiring ten-percenters, your pet project required publicity; readers would have to send away for an expensively-designed-and-printed catalogue by mail. Months would pass. Now you just do a fucking Google image search. Sorry, Amok. Your time has passed. Rotisserie® League LifeNow, this I don’t understand. Perhaps because I do not understand the Rotisserie® League concept. You say “rotisserie” to me and all I think is Felix Unger getting all upset on The Odd Couple because he chose the wrong door on a game show and lost out on one. Rotisserie® League is today a difficult concept to Google. I think it has something to do with betting on fantasy teams. You mix and match players – or, I suppose, in my case, 200-pound-or-heavier or red-haired bobsledders (we do, in fact, have a selection of both, of various nationalities) – onto a dream team of your choice, and then tabulate their results from their actual teams. And if you’re extra-smart, you bet on Canada over Bangladesh in cricket. Spy pushes the Rotisserie® pedal (pedal?) to the metal in Rotisserie® League Life. “To assemble your team, pick one entry from each category below, then call 1-900-884-4-SPY.” Player positions include:
Stratagem: MegatartsOur Contributors page this month lists:
“ ‘That’s not my department,’ says Wernher von Braun”We keep blowing up space shuttles, which might perhaps be trying to tell us something. Spy, March 1991, also told us exploding space shuttles were trying to tell us something. “Wernher von Braun, We Hardly Knew Ye” (David Shenk):
Hitlerian brute?You thought the piece excerpted above was an eerie coinkydink? You ain’t seen nothin’ yet. “Saddam Hussein: Hitlerian Brute or America’s Savio[u]r? (Or Ted Turner’s New Best Friend?)” by David Shenk (again) asks:
PhallocentrismThe fINE PRINT:
The rest of the piece is equally prurient and fascinating, but extends half the length of a sex manual itself. Or perhaps you’d like to compare two devices for measuring penis volume?
“But your machine wasn’t on”A Hollywood functionary rang me in the late ’80s. She mentioned she had rung on a previous day, “but your machine wasn’t on.” Because I didn’t have one. These celebrities, however, do.
Name that rug, Mr. Spock!Some U.S. senator or other had a wee hypocrisy problem. He sponsored a bill limiting textile imports, but his tailor was in South Korea.
Coolhunting – before it sold outI can barely believe the coinkydink. I’m trudging through Pattern Recognition by Gibson, logging and annotating it. The book follows the odyssey of a coolhunter obsessed with anonymous video footage posted online. In this month’s Spy, “Tomorrow’s Forecast Calls for Shimmery Fabrics, Portable Fax Machines [!], Senegalese Cuisine and Heroic Romanticism” by Lynda Edwards concerns trendspotters, the coolhunters of the ’80s. The article could have used a trim, but benefits hugely from direct quotes by the Eurotrash trendspotters (and Faith Popcorn) it features.
Also: “Faith Popcorn, née Plotkin – she changed her name because a boyfriend once called her Popcorn and “I said I like that name. And I changed it. It was the sixties.” But getting back to a theme here:
Spy’s own spotted trends (by David Kamp), which presumably will not hold up logging plans in the nationstate of Pacifica?
Oh. This part isn’t significant or anything: I see my entire adulthood really has been explained. Believe what I tell you about the influence of Spy on my personality. The story ends on a crushing note: “the way advertisers market luxury products, which for years have been pedaled as the gross fruits of sheer wealth.” “Pedaled”? End in whimperBack of the book is so weak this month that, ten full years later, Cartman would have dismissed it with “Dude, this shit is weak.” PARTY POOP:
|
You are here: fawny.org → Ten Years Ago in SPY → Archives → January 1991 Updated: 2001.11.11 See also: Interview with Alex Isley, former SPY art director |