We hereby cast our eye back on SPY, “The New York Monthly” – that exemplar of “irony,” memorably belligerent, bilious adjective chains, and thrillingly recherché typography, from which our entire writing style (and ironic, memorable, belligerent, bilious, and recherché personality) derived. Where possible, we do actually attempt to stick to a precise ten-year retrospective, but we reserve the right to mix and match. |
May 1990I tried to be all conscientious and GET THIS PARTY STARTED... QUICKLY! by working on this month’s recap well ahead of time, only to discover I had chosen the most boring issue in the history of Spy. “Hit & Run,” allegedlyThe cover hedges its bets with multiple hard-to-unpack headline levels: HIT & RUN: Washington Road Trip! Our Special D.C. Issue. But what, if anything, is special about it? Start with the irony, which we should all have seen coming, that a magazine dedicated to a boring town will be as boring as the bores who live in the boring town. It’s generous to call Washington a “swamp.” Even the article on Washington sex scandals was of no interest whatsoever because who the hell cares whom pencil-necked geeks in Washington are fucking? We soldier wearily on. These are our priority action items. Advertising analysisYou may have heard of Comedy Central in the United States. Did you know it was such an unexpected concept circa 1990 that it had to be telegraphed in its official name, TV Comedy Network? Actually, another set of Ukrainian nesting dolls of headlines: HA! TV Comedy Network™. TV Comedy That Works. (What the hell does that mean?) Three frigging pages in this month’s Spy.
I love the smell of superfluous advertising-copywriter capitalization in the morning. How many times have you schlepped home from work and exclaimed “Phew! I’m sure in the mood for some TV Comedy”? Doesn’t it all have the scent of death, really? “Comedy.” You know full well that, to fill an all-day network, any program that isn’t as despair-inducing as They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? – my oft-cited most depressing movie ever – will receive an honourary conceptual upgrade to the category of Comedy and air TV, making it, in some bureaucratic literal sense, TV Comedy. But does it work? Do you laugh? Seldom, I should think. At best you hope for intelligence, a bit of wit. Jon Stewart Silverman is our current apotheosis, and I rarely “LOL,” as the kids say. TV Comedy is a marketing category, not broadcasting that makes you laugh. That’s why they have to Capitalize It. And they have to tell us “TV Comedy That Works.” They tried before and it didn’t? HA! TV Comedy Network™’s double-truck advertisement is preceded by a full-pager meta-ironically reading “We bought this expensive third page just to make the ad on the next two pages seem more important.” A man launches horizontally out a window, his business suit and briefcase (but not his sensible shoes) brilliantly on fire, as though in an outtake from a Pink Floyd LP cover. SUREFIRE COMEDY reads the dead-obvious headline. The lavish advertising outlay unwittingly expresses the grasping despair of a TV Comedy Network and, by extension, of comedy writers, the most depressive lot this side of the Steppes. Rather giving it all away, I should think. Three “expensive” pages with the stink of failure, and where there’s stink, there’s carrion (PDF):
The malformed spawn lasted all of nine months, about as long as I feel I’ve been slogging through one dispiriting detail after another. And this issue doesn’t get any better from here. Let me now live out a cherished dream and bellow to the four walls: Fuck you, Ryuichi Sakamoto! He isn’t quite everything that’s wrong with the Japanese in one convenient, washed-up, démodé package, but close enough. Here he’s got double facing 2/3-page adverts, with Sakamoto-“sensei” looking all feminine, transcendent, and artistique in the ads’ shirtless, eyes-closed, snooty-nosed beauty shots. A rice queen’s dream, really, perhaps indicating what is so very wrong with rice queens. Quick test: Name three songs by Ryuichi Sakamoto. Or hum ten seconds of one. Or identify a song by Sakamoto you know you have enjoyed. (Pointing at its entry on a CD booklet is permissible.) DQ yourself outright if all that comes to mind is the phrase “Merry Christmas, Mr. Lawrence.” For extra credit, name the director of that film and recount two scenes from it you enjoyed. Anyone? No? Awww. Another poseur milestone destroyed. (My pleasure.) The one and only saving grace of Ryuichi Sakamoto (not by a longshot important enough to neutralize everything else, but of genuine note): He was note-perfect as the twee Orientalist director of a video-within-a-video in Mark Romanek’s mentholated music video for Madonna, “Rain.” Unmatched. When he finally croaks, stop yourself from getting upset. You never knew anything about him; all you knew was his name, which you wore as a badge of your intellectual street cred, such as it is. The news is not all bad on this spread, however: Spy’s hard-to-find-even-on-eBay series of Spy Notes is promoted, along with an impossible-to-find pamphlet entitled Spy Novel-o-Matic. YOU’RE NOT THE SORT OF PERSON WHO READS BOOKS LIKE THESE screams the headline, accurately. (You’re the sort of person who loves the way “Ryuichi Sakamoto” trips off the tongue. And you simply adore teriyaki.)
A strange four-page insert is printed on extra-stiff paper, ensuring the issue opens to that spread every single time. It’s for Bacardi Black. And the pages are inky, dense black on black, with barely-perceptible shadows of colour and text (save for the headline on page one). Superb. And now I have just set myself up for rampant Googling of the phrase “black on black.” Meanwhile, an incongruously lowbrow advert for Arrowwood [“A stunning blend of management meeting centre and luxury resort”: Washington-related Spy issues always get the meeting centres and luxury resorts they deserve) features some hapless man in a comb-over out for a swim. His rictus is suitable for a course in repairing other plastic surgeons’ mistakes. Dead-giveaway alertMalcolm Forbes was an homosexualist and a leather queen, as was revealed, finally, at long last, by Signorile a month after Forbes kicked off in February 1990. At that point, we had more of an inkling what was meant by the slogan “capitalist tool.” And here we are in May 1990. (The timing is interesting, isn’t it?) An advertisement entitled “A breakthrough in free enterprise” trumpets Forbes as it “joins with Europe’s dynamic publisher, BURDA [sic], to produce a spectacular new German business and lifestyle magazine – Forbes von Burda.” We’re already at the punchline, right? Forbes von Burda? Who’s that, the kind of fat dominatrixen who keep showing up in Rosa von Praunheim films? (Fags all just love fat women, whom we know prefer to be called “zaftig,” even if they are also German.) Oh, but we’re not done yet. Not hardly!
The photo atop the advertisement? It’s Malcolm Forbes in cream-coloured leathers, a helmet, and a red jacket emblazoned CAPITALIST TOOL. His Where, exactly, were Forbes and his capitalist tool photographed? Well, don’t bother with the investigative reporting. Check the photo caption: “Malcolm Forbes at the Berlin Wall.” Just how many punchlines can you jam into a single advertisement? Lighten up, K-C“The fINE PRINT”:
What else do you do to comments during sales meetings but ridicule them?
“You’ve got a lot of nerve calling here,
|
You are here: fawny.org → Ten Years Ago in SPY → Archives → May 1989 Updated: 2003.05.04 See also: Interview with Alex Isley, former SPY art director |