September 1988Poring not at all thoroughly or consistently through my pile o’ Spy, I found no January or January/February issues beyond the one already reviewed, so I then pawed desperately, like a child who has unwrapped nothing but socks and underwear under the tree, for a viable surrogate. Naturally, I would select the gigantic, solid, prime-of-life September 1988 emission – 148 pages long, with perfect binding and Tracy Ullman on a skateboard. It’s “Life-Style Hell: Our Special Los Angeles Issue.” Advertising analysisAdvertisements aimed at advertising buyers are thankfully uncommon in this action-packed issue, but two faintly nauseating examples shove their life(-)style down your throat early on. Page 6: A “Perception. Reality” ad from Rolling Stone. One can look back on this campaign now as pure Boomer apologia, but here in the Aughties, even Boomers aren’t what they used to be: They’re quite simply the easiest-to-hate generation in human history. It’s gender-specific, though: Boomer men are the enemy, and I have described the archetype elsewhere as “some Boomer functionary with a grey beard, a paunch, a costly, sweaty, cellulite-addled wife, and a throbbing prostate.” Here the advertisement shows a pair of sandals made from tire treads as “Perception” and a pair of actual tires as “Reality.” Chronicle of Rampant Piggish SUV Ownership Foretold? Next, People (“Pimple”) positions itself as antidote to workaholism:
– ah; the truth is revealed –
– Andrew Sullivan, this means you –
That is, people they think are better than themselves. I also object to the formula letting their hair down, elliptically cited in the ad copy; only girls do that, and only girls who distinguish between their work or “formal” personæ and their “real” selves. Whereas for girls like me who are exactly the same person day in and day out, and who have no hair on the head to let down, the analogy rings untrue. It’s too convenient and gladhanding – hard-working office ladies who like nothing more than to draw a bath, let their hair down, and engage their higher faculties reading People. You are aware, of course, that when I was a schoolgirl I wrote a letter to People stating that magazine had “the best typesetting anywhere, and that includes books”? What you read here may be construed as a backlash against oneself. Page 20 stacks an ad for Andy Summers’ album Mysterious Barricades under another for a Toshiba CD player. We can see now which “product” would stand the test of time. Summers’ chief artistic achivement is in fact his narrative 1987 music video “Love Is the Strangest Way”; nothing else he’s ever done comes close, and he cannot so much as boast the advantage of a father formerly in the CIA. The Toshiba CD player, while square in shape, would still be a pretty good deal today: “It has a three-beam laser pick-up [I don’t remember ever reading that term outside of a repair manual], an LCD display with track, lap and remaining-time indicators. And it can play 5″ CDs and the new 3″ CD singles. At home, there’s 16-program random memory with repeat and wireless remote control. (Plus a wired remote for outdoors.)” This 1988-era machine can do more than my 1998-era Panasonic portable CD player. Both machines would presumably play Mysterious Barricades equally well. The album, in fact, is advertised as being available “on compact disc, audophile vinyl and chrome cassette.” Ooh. Chrome cassette. That makes all the difference. To hell with the Toshiba – it’ll even play back in my DCC deck! We return to our old friends Aiwa (op. cit.). Gamely, the also-ran electronics maker buys two full pages for a portable cassette player. (Oh, but why, when Toshiba has such a nice CD player on offer?) Anyway, you know it’ll be indestructible, mostly because I keep telling you so. The typography again uses thick monoline markers, this time to underline sections of Franklin Gothic ad copy. It’s aggressively ugly and it almost works. Tracy Chapman merits a full-page ad. Which is its worst feature, the hopelessly slipshod and grainy photograph (slower-speed film, please!) or the alleged selling point “ ‘1988’s Best New Artist’ – Rolling Stone”? (Perception. Reality.) Redux: Mad Ave.’s ongoing laundromat fantasia continues in this month’s Spy. “Separate loads. Mutual interests. Lee jeans” declares the double-truck spread, consisting of a handsome, chiseled-jawed blond and some chick in a halter top whom I can hardly be expected to pay much attention to. The mythos here is that laundromats are places where well-put-together people can meet as if serendipitously – educated, well-dressed elites whose charming prewar apartments perched over high-street retail stores or in off-the-beaten-track coach houses cannot be expected to come equipped with mod cons like washers and dryers. (Or showers, actually. Or bathtubs located in bathrooms.) What is the reality? Laundromats are overrun with uneducated paupers who use laundromats the way their mamas and grandmas did and who, like their mamas and grandmas, call the places “laundrymats.” What you’re most likely to pick up at a laundromat is lice. LettersA surprisingly inviscid correspondence column this month, overrun with shocked and appalled letters demanding or offering clarifications and corrections of previous Spy articles. Now, where’s the fun in that? Nonetheless, one epistle takes the prize for unwelcome visual image.
Masthead reviewAnother odd historical surprise awaits us in Spy’s masthead. Really, there seems to be some new tidbit in there every month. Listed as Chief of Research is none other than Cynthia Cotts, currently the Village Voice’s media columnist. (Our art directron is B.W. Honeycutt.) Forgetful NaziAnd no doubt C. Cotts would be all over a story like this month’s instalment of the “Times” column (you try punctuating that phrase) by J.J. Hunsecker.
“How to Tell Rap Groups Apart”Comic by Elan.
“What If Sigmund Freud Had Been a Former Fashion Model”Henry Alford, we need you back.
Los Angeles: The enemy withinThe theme of the issue is either California or Los Angeles, depending on how you slice it, and the selection is superb. “Fashion Tips for Fall” by Jamie Malanowski and Deborah Michel provides tips on what to wear to avoid being mistaken for a gang member.
Next, how long do Hollywood luminaries take to return a call consisting of the words “I have Mr. Stallone on the line”? Anything from “immediately” (Carrie Fisher) to 48 minutes, 50 seconds (Michael Mann) to over an hour (a State Department “spokesman”). Now, what about the control group? Here Joey Bishop fulfils that role, and the results are summed up by the William Morris Agency’s question “Can you tell me who he is?” “Good Weather and Bad Teeth” by Richard Stengel (“an Oxford-educated American”) reports on “Why the British Love L.A., Why L.A. Loves the British.” The money and climate, obviously. The chance to drive 1960s Mustang Convertibles, it goes without saying (and this is the sole detail I recalled from the article). “The British commercial directors are all, as they say in the business, very visual. Mostly it is direction that calls attention to itself. Many of their movies, like Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner, are not so much directed as art-directed. The action seems to take place in coke-time.” But also:
“Los Angeles: City Without Shame” had to be good because it’s written by the impossibly hilarious Paul Rudnick, a man who can make even Charlie Rose laugh. (I have witnessed this myself.)
Rudnick then goes on to blow it somewhat through case-by-case analysis (Valerie Harper, Joan Rivers, Nancy Reagan) showing that “if you move to Los Angeles, you will ultimately become Joan Collins.” Turning the page, the eye is assaulted by a hideous typographic design in which two paragraphs of display copy alternate lines (and fonts). “A Cavalcade of Schmucks,” it’s called, and fortunately the meat of the article starts on another page.
“Hollywood Royalty” lists a genealogy of Dukes, Duchesses, Earls, Marchionesses (quoi?), Viscounts, and Barons, none of them remotely interesting save for the subheads.
It was the Village Voice that really summed it up, in “The Last New York–L.A. Article” circa 1986. L.A.: Fuck me. New York: Fuck you. Let your hair down! You are here: fawny.org → Ten Years Ago in SPY → Archives → September 1998 Updated: 2001.10.06 See also: Interview with Alex Isley, former SPY art director |